The Donkey Is Sleeping Today

Archive for the ‘2010 Midterm Elections’ Category

Ben Quayle’s Lost Blog Post?

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Politics on August 16, 2010 at 3:41 pm

The Donkey Edge has unearthed an archived post from an unnamed racy web site based in Arizona by one Brock Landers, which may or may not be the pseudonym for Ben Quayle, current Republican candidate for Congress in AZ-3.

We leave it to our readers to decide.

I was flipping through the channels the other day and had to salute when the “Foxiest” lady appeared on my 60-inch. I normally go for the fiery redheads, but who could resist such a bad kitty? Raaahhhrrr!

And if blondes have more fun, then this fanboy wanted her to preach my family values. Just scope out some snaps I dug up of this hot potatoe.

But then she opened her mouth, and I could immediately tell we were on the same brainwaves. We both think the socialist/communist/fascist/illegitimate Obama is the worst president in history. Rasmussen says so: it must be true. Put your eyeballs on a recent video of her in action (warning: NSFW).

I could tell immediately that she worked just as hard as Obama does. And I dig her circular logic. Oh, Megyn, you torture me more than Dick Cheney on a CIA rendition. We go together like Lindsay Lohan and booze. I’d vote us best-looking couple in the universe, if I knew how.

I mean, there should be laws against the two of us dating we’re so hot. If we ever hooked up, it would be like combining matter and anti-matter, creating a devastating explosion that would obliterate the world – like the new health care reform act.

But let’s throw intelligence to the wind. Forget knocking boots: we could just knock the hell out of Washington together. Take some of the Social Security money and run off to the casinos on Wall Street. Take my children nieces out to a Tea Party. Chase some Mexicans back across the border.

Book me like your guest, you right-wing vixen. I’m your puppet.

My Father Is Pissed

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Bed-Wetters, Politics on August 14, 2010 at 3:14 pm

Press Secretary Robert "Glibbs" Hard At Work

Now I know what you’re thinking. Since I’m a liberal blogger, I must be still living at home in my parent’s basement, wearing pajamas to “work” and dreaming of the next Comic-Con.  Or maybe my father is pissed because I broke curfew, or wrecked the car, or worshiped the “Aqua Buddha.”

No, my father is pissed because, as a lifelong Democrat, he is tired of being taken for granted and pissed on by the brain-dead, Inside-the-Beltway Democratic Establishment. And he was really torqued off by Robert Glibbs recent comments about the “professional left.” And trust me, I’ve seen my father pissed off plenty of times (mostly during my teenage years, but that’s another post).

I know the Democratic establishment thinks of me as a drooling, pajama-clad, drug-addled hippie miscreant who never showers. I know that Robert Glibbs has a problem with the “professional left” and their hatred for the Pentagon and their love for drugs, but when you lose my father, you’ve really screwed the pooch.

This is a man who idolizes Harry S. Truman. I don’t think a book about Truman has been published that my father has not read.  This is a man who loves the ideals of the Democratic Party (equality of economic opportunity, equality under the law, fighting for the middle and working class) and loathes Republicans so much that (to my knowledge) he has never once voted for one.

Although there was the time during the 2000 election when he confessed to me that he admired John McCain for his independent thinking. I couldn’t speak to him for two weeks: it was like finding out your father had a secret second family halfway across the country.

We patched things up when he voted for Gore.

And my mother? She’s on a first-name basis with her local Congressman, Martin Heinrich. It’s incredible really.  My mother has become quite the activist, regularly lobbying the Congressman as a private citizen on issues she feels are important to her, her family, and the greater good.  But I guess that would qualify her as part of the “professional left,” so who really cares? Right, Glibbsy?

But what’s the big deal about my father? As Glibbs so eloquently put it, “I don’t think [liberal voters won’t show up].”

But the silver-tongued Southerner is dead wrong.

My father, like millions of other Americans, is scared.  He’s scared of the rhetoric oozing from the Beltway that the Villagers want to take torches and pitchforks to Social Security.  Not so much because he fears he will suddenly lose his benefits but because he fears for what will happen to my generation and my (future) kids’ generation.

He’s scared that we’re trading one quagmire for another, pulling out of Iraq only to divert precious lives and treasure back into Afghanistan – a war that more and more people are calling “unwinnable.” But we’re not talking about someone who wants to “eliminate the Pentagon.” We’re talking about a decorated war veteran who fought proudly for his country in Vietnam and who knows first-hand the personal cost of having to serve halfway across the world in a war with no clear objective and no clear exit strategy.

He’s scared that the health care reform act doesn’t go far enough. Not for himself: he’s on Medicare, but for people like his son and daughter-in-law who are forced to buy health insurance as individuals and are still subjected to draconian pre-existing conditions rules and spiraling premiums. At least until 2014 (and what a brilliant political move that was).

This is also a man who takes his civic duty to vote so seriously that he once risked being disciplined for insubordination when he argued with his Commanding Officer that it was his right by law to go vote. His offense – the temerity to ask for time off from his duties to vote in the 1968 presidential election.  Yup, he voted for Humphrey.

And despite all that, he is openly and angrily talking about not voting this November. An email from Organizing For America particularly incensed him after Glibbs’ insensitive remarks – one in which it asked him to make a promise to vote. My father told me last night that he emailed a promise back – that he would be getting drug-tested on election day, since the administration clearly had little regard for his self-control and obvious sobriety.

Now my father didn’t just fall off the turnip truck.  He’s not one to rail against the slow progress of change or the compromises made when passing legislation in the sausage factory that is the U.S. Congress, but he’s also upset that this administration made promises that they simply have discarded along the way like so much roadside trash.  He’s upset that he and my mom gave hundreds of dollars to candidate Obama (off a fixed income) and both worked to see him elected, only to have the administration disparage them and take them for granted.

This is not the change my parents believed in.  And they aren’t part of the “professional left.” They are the long-time, bedrock base Democratic voters that continue to vote to put Democrats back in office, election after election. And they’re thinking of not even voting.

Talk about an enthusiasm gap.

News flash to the Obama administration: way to take a gun and shoot yourself in the foot. But this is nothing new really.  There’s a history of hating the left in this administration.  Rahm hates the DFHers, and an unnamed administration source took great delight in tweaking another important Democratic constituency when it said unions “flushed $10 million down the toilet” to defeat Blanche Lincoln in the primary.  Of course, when she loses by 20 percent of the vote this fall, we’ll see how many millions the brain-dead Democratic Establishment wasted.

But here’s another piece of advice for this administration: it’s called the “bully pulpit” for a reason.  Strong presidents use it to pass the legislation they want.  They reach across the aisle when necessary but only when it suits their purpose. And they don’t negotiate against themselves to support some fantasy of Kumbaya post-partisanship.

Simply put, who gives a shit how many Republican votes you can attract when the legislation (that you are ultimately going to have to answer for) gets watered down to next to nothing? My father will be quick to tell you that Truman had a sign on his desk that read “The Buck Stops Here.”

So what’s the sign on Robert Glibbs’ desk say? I don’t know, but at this point, it should read “Head Bedwetter In Charge of Whiny Tirades.”  But I guess being Press Secretary means never having to say you’re sorry.

Forget, Cronkite. This administration has just lost my father.

-SF

Weiner Watch

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Message/Framing, Politics on July 30, 2010 at 4:08 pm

Democratic Hero Rep. Anthony Weiner

We at The Donkey Edge are starting yet another feature we like to call Weiner Watch.  We have been huge fans of Congressman Anthony Weiner (D-NY), especially since the health care reform debate of last year.

Never one to mince words, Weiner was a solid advocate for not only the public option but also for the fact that single payer was the most cost-effective and efficient health care system.

Sadly, the Democratic leadership did not listen.

But Congressman Weiner is never one to back down from a fight and continually stands up to Republicans, calling them out for their lies and their bullying tactics.  He never adopts right-wing frames and never gives in to conservative dogma.

To wit, Weiner has said:

- On health care reform

“Make no mistake about it, every single Republican I have ever met in my entire life is a wholly owned subsidiary of the insurance industry.”

- To Bill O’Reilly

I don’t know how else to say this, Bill, I have a very big burden debunking every one of the mistakes your making…

- On gay marriage

Sooner or later they are going to live in a New York City where gay marriage is not only legal, but it’s common and they don’t even notice.

And he has targeted Goldline (which uses Glenn Beck as its shill) for its allegedly fraudulent activities, calling it an “unholy alliance” between the two.

But last night, Rep. Weiner saved his harshest criticism to date for the Republicans, most of whom voted against the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which would have given much-needed health care to those 9/11 first responders and clean-up volunteers who are now sickened by the toxins they were exposed to at Ground Zero.

The Democrats called for a two-thirds majority vote on this issue in order to prevent the Republicans from attaching overly partisan amendments to what should have been a slam-dunk passage of a popular bill.  But the Republicans stood behind procedure and voted against the bill, denying these 9-11 heroes the health care they need and so richly deserve.

Here’s Rep. Weiner’s fiery speech on the floor of Congress:

He even went on Faux News later to defend his outrage and to debate his colleague, Peter King (R-NY), who allowed all but 12 members of his caucus to vote against the bill, hiding behind procedure (starts at 7:28 mark).

To those Democrats who think he may have gone too far or ended up showing weakness or ineffectiveness in the face of Republican bullying tactics, I will use Congressman Weiner’s own words against them.

Don’t be one of those Democrats who “bring a library book to a knife fight.”

People’s lives and livelihoods are at stake every day, and we need more people like Rep. Anthony Weiner to defend us.

-SF

Doubling Down On The Crazy

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Politics on July 24, 2010 at 1:41 pm

Speaker Nancy Pelosi inspired Netroots Nation this morning with her passionate defense of liberal values and the remarkable amount of legislation that has been passed this session of Congress (at least in the House). But the most important take-away from her town hall meeting was her warning to Republicans that “the leverage has changed in Washington to favor the middle class” and that “we will NOT be going backwards.”

Recent remarks made by the Tea Party’s Mad Hatter, Michele Bachmann, underscore our need to prevent the Republicans from regaining any majority in Congress.

All Kinds Of Crazy

Usually, Bachmann is all kinds of crazy. She has accused Obama and the Democrats of trying to set up secret re-education camps for America‘s youth; using census information to round people up in internment camps; abandoning the dollar and creating a “One-World” currency; and even called for a media witch hunt to ferret out the “anti-American” members of Congress.  Sadly, there are many other examples.

But Thursday, she showed a rare instance of lucidity when she told a gathering at the GOP Youth Convention about her ideal plans for the legislative calendar if Republicans were to gain control of the House this fall (shudder).

Oh, I think that’s all we should do. I think that all we should do is issue subpoenas and have one hearing after another.

[…]

This is the year – this is it. All of our chips are on November. If we don’t get it back and then starve the beast – the House, we have the power of the purse – so we can starve ObamaCare. We don’t have to fund any of these programs and that’s exactly what we need to do – defund all of this nonsense and then unwind it.

Here’s the audio:

So instead of solving the multitude of problems our nation faces and make lives better for the middle and working class, Bachman wants the government to focus exclusively on modern-day witch-hunts that have no basis in fact; paper Constitution Avenue with a blizzard of subpoenas; and completely shut down the government in order to bring down Obama at any cost.

Party like it’s 1999.

Despite our frustration with Obama and the Democrats, there really is a huge difference between the parties.  This rare moment of naked Republican truth illustrates exactly why.  That’s why we must work hard to keep a Democratic majority in both chambers of Congress, despite our occasional frustration.

Here’s Bachmann’s opponent this fall – Tarryl Clark. She’s a well-respected, progressive MN state senator who is running an aggressive campaign against “the crazy.” The Washington Post even called her a “serious challenger.” Check out Clark’s campaign’s web site here.

-SF

Donkey Ad Watch: Alan Grayson Edition

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Donkey Ad Watch, Message/Framing, Politics on July 20, 2010 at 2:20 pm

Yesterday, we talked about a teaching moment for Democrats who constantly give in to right-wing frames and who coddle conservatives, even when Republicans will criticize them no matter what they do. Rep. Alan Grayson is an exception – one of the few courageous Democrats who is not afraid to confront Republicans by calling them out on their (constant) crap.

While the following video is technically not an ad, it perfectly encapsulates the type of messaging fellow Democrats should be adopting. He tells a very emotional story from his own family’s personal experience and frames the Republicans as they truly are – as the out-of-touch defenders of the wealthy and the powerful that have no interest in helping the rest of the 99 percent of America that plays by the rules and watches as their piece of the pie shrinks every day.

Rep. Alan Grayson is one of the strongest voices ordinary Americans have in Congress, and the Republicans would love nothing more than to take him out precisely because he speaks truth to power.  If you feel so inclined, here’s an Act Blue page that our pals at Blue America PAC set up to donate to Grayson (and a host of other great progressive candidates).

-SF

UPDATE: What Digby said.

Rove Demagogues The Stimulus – A Teaching Moment For Democrats

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Message/Framing, Politics on July 19, 2010 at 1:23 am

Sam Stein at The Huffington Post published a story yesterday about a TV ad attacking Harry Reid that was produced by a new conservative group called American Crossroads. At first glance, one might think, “wow, did the sun rise in the east again”? But this ad has the audacity to criticize Reid for NOT BRINGING ENOUGH stimulus money back home to Nevada.

Now here’s what the inside-the-beltway Democratic establishment is probably thinking when they see this ad. Weren’t the Republicans screaming like stuck pigs that the stimulus was wasteful spending? Didn’t they say it would do nothing to help rescue the troubled economy? Didn’t they then race to photo-ops like Kim Kardashian to a football player whenever there was a groundbreaking event due to stimulus spending in their district?

Yes, yes, and yes, but that’s not the point.

So they comfort themselves by looking at the person behind the ad. It’s none other than Mr. Karl “Attack Their Strengths And Turn Them Into A Weakness” Rove. They say: remember the 2004 presidential election? We Dems thought John Kerry was bulletproof on Iraq and on matters of national security. After all, he was a decorated war hero, and they lied about his record. They’ll remind everyone that Karl Rove and his cronies are unethical assholes and are not to be trusted.

True. But that’s also not the point.

An asshole, but that's not the point.

Then they’ll look at the cookie-cutter attack ad and point out that the sources cited in the spot are a year-and-a-half old and rely on conjecture rather than solid data, which refutes the “fact” that Nevada ranks 50th in stimulus funding (13 states have received less).

Nope, still not the point.

There’s a much bigger take-away from this ad, but for the most part, Democrats in Washington are too stupid or too afraid to see it. Simply put, the Republicans will talk out of both sides of their mouths on the same issue and criticize Democrats NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO.

In terms of the stimulus, most every notable progressive economist, from Paul Krugman to Dean Baker, James Galbraith, Eileen Appelbaum and Norielle Roubini, warned that the stimulus package was too small, but the Administration powered ahead with its bipartisan fetish to capture three Senate Republican votes, watering down the bill in the process.

And what happened? The progressive economists that Geithner and Summers shunned were right: the stimulus wasn’t big enough. Joe Biden even admitted it on national television this weekend (again Sam Stein at The Huffington Post). That’s kind of a big fucking deal, because in the process, Biden blamed the Republicans for the size of the stimulus, saying that’s all they would allow. But the reality is the Dems had the political wind at their backs and pissed away a golden opportunity in the name of bipartisanship. Whining about it now just makes Democrats look weak and ineffectual, owing to the fact that they had 59 freakin’ Senators in the caucus at the time (still do).

Certainly, the stimulus helped stem the economic bleeding, blunted unemployment and prevented an even worse recession/depression, but we aren’t out of the economic woods by a long shot, mostly because the stimulus money is running out and we’re still staring down the barrel of double-digit unemployment.

And now the Republicans are screaming that the stimulus was a giant mistake and that Obama’s policies (and by extension ALL Democratic policies) are failures. Unfortunately, voters are receptive to these lies because they are still feeling the effects of the economic downturn and are afraid it won’t improve any time soon. Emotions trump facts every time, especially when it comes to a voter’s pocketbook or sense of security.

So then what’s the point?

  1. Republicans do not want to extend a hand of bipartisanship across the aisle. They want to ball up their fist and punch Democrats in the face. It’s all about the will to power with them. So stop trying to appease conservatives to attract one or two Republican votes, which you more than likely won’t get anyway.
  2. No matter what you do, the Republicans will ALWAYS criticize you, so if you’re going to go down, then at least go down swinging. Stop pushing half-measures (stimulus, health care, and financial reform spring to mind) and pass the strongest progressive legislation you can because it’s better for America and for your electoral chances.

At least that way you’re seen as principled and don’t have to go on the teevee, wring your hands, and think to yourself “woulda, coulda, shoulda.”

Are you listening Democrats?

-SF

Meg, Lies and Videotape

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Donkey Ad Watch, Idiocracy, Message/Framing, Politics, Propaganda on July 16, 2010 at 3:17 pm

I used to think that facts matter. You remember facts. The things that actually exist. Yup, I used to think that people could look at the facts objectively and see, for instance, that the reason they’re soaking wet is because they’ve been standing in the rain without an umbrella for over an hour. Or the reason we’re in such a deep debt hole is primarily because of the dynamic duo of Bush Tax Cuts and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I know the “very serious people” have decided to make national debt a hot topic these days (and why now, again?) but this chart should make that discussion pretty short. Simply get out of Iraq and Afghanistan and let the Bush Tax Cuts lapse at the end of the year and we will be back on the road to fiscal health (even Alan Greenspan agrees – look!)

Here’s another doozie of a chart that makes up look down and blue look red. It charts the increase in the national debt per president since before Jimmy Carter took office.


So, you mean that the notion of  “tax and spend Democrats” has no basis in reality? In fact the exact opposite is true: Republican presidents have run HUGE deficits compared to their Democratic counterparts. Where are those facts being touted in the “liberal” media?

This all brings me to Meg Whitman and her strategy to become the next governor of the Golden State. Last month E-Meg’s campaign put out this incredibly well-crafted buzz saw of an ad that lit up Jerry Brown like that awesome bag of weed we smoked when Moonbeam was elected in the 70′s.

Even KABC could wrestle this one down:

This is only one example. Lying is blanketed across Meg Whitman’s ads which have been criticized by factcheck.org and California Working Families. But this isn’t a big deal. It’s not the end of the world because facts will win the day, right?

Not so fast. The Oracle, Digby, referenced an article from the Boston Globe this week which will mess with your sense of right and wrong, literally: (emphasis mine)

Recently, a few political scientists have begun to discover a human tendency deeply discouraging to anyone with faith in the power of information. It’s this: Facts don’t necessarily have the power to change our minds. In fact, quite the opposite. In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.

Go on:

These findings open a long-running argument about the political ignorance of American citizens to broader questions about the interplay between the nature of human intelligence and our democratic ideals. Most of us like to believe that our opinions have been formed over time by careful, rational consideration of facts and ideas, and that the decisions based on those opinions, therefore, have the ring of soundness and intelligence. In reality, we often base our opinions on our beliefs, which can have an uneasy relationship with facts. And rather than facts driving beliefs, our beliefs can dictate the facts we chose to accept. They can cause us to twist facts so they fit better with our preconceived notions. Worst of all, they can lead us to uncritically accept bad information just because it reinforces our beliefs. This reinforcement makes us more confident we’re right, and even less likely to listen to any new information. And then we vote.

And then this:

On its own, this might not be a problem: People ignorant of the facts could simply choose not to vote. But instead, it appears that misinformed people often have some of the strongest political opinions.

So, we all know that there are lies. And when lies become memes and memes become policy then most everyone suffers, certainly the “small people” who lose our jobs, homes, retirements, and lives. The fact-deniers have known this for a long time. They’ve had decades of success getting their way by systematically lying which culminated in the Orwellian double speak which the Bush Administration took to new (and destructive) heights.

So at the end of the day, it’s simply a strategy. And, sadly, an effective one at that. If you keep telling lies to people who want to believe them they will continue believing the lies. They will also become the most passionate advocates of that lie because of the magic of the human brain. And the great part is that if the truth heads their way they will defend the lies with their lives. Often literally. It is that basic to human behavior.

Meg Whitman has chosen to follow this path. Lying as a strategy. Like dinner parties and fund raisers. Like Twitter and Facebook. She’s not the first, but she may be one of the best.

And I’m afraid it will work.

- SH

8/24 UPDATE: See our new ad that skewers Meg Whitman’s voting record here.

7/17 Update: Even the LA Times has picked up on the up on the fact that Meg lies with impunity in this story. She is full steam ahead in her “Campaign Which Facts Forgot” tour. They report on the “new” policy proposal booklet Meg put out yesterday:

The booklet, which features glossy pictures and graphics, is a mixture of Whitman’s policy proposals and criticisms of Brown. It contains some of the same falsehoods that have been featured in Whitman’s television ads or statements.

It continues:

The booklet is also disingenuous in its discussion of the economic conditions during Brown’s two terms as governor, from 1975 to 1983. It says Brown left the state with “record high” unemployment rate of 11.1%, Unemployment was higher both during the Great Depression and today, and the booklet fails to note that his departure coincided with a recession in which joblessness rose nationwide.

“It’s not new, it’s the same as her old one, just with more pictures, which I didn’t think was possible,” Brown spokesman Sterling Clifford said. “The attacks on Jerry are old lies, new format.”

7/17 Update: First she lies, then she spies. From the Sacramento Bee via the Miami Herald.

The leaders of the California Nurses Association had barely wrapped up a news conference recently slamming GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman when they learned Whitman’s campaign had been watching them the whole time.A volunteer for the Republican had sneaked into the event held at the union’s downtown Oakland headquarters and sent live streaming video back to the campaign nearly 50 miles away in Cupertino. Within hours, Whitman aides were blasting to supporters an e-mail response to the event that featured clandestine video snippets.

The entire article is here.

7/19 Update: The horns are sounding. Seems like more people every day are on to eMeg. Phil Trounstine and Jerry Roberts have an excellent list of eMeg’s prevarications here and on their HuffPo piece this morning entitled “The Death of Truth: eMeg and the Politics of Lying” which details her flip-flops:

Indeed, when it comes to killing truth, eMeg is miles ahead in felony flip-floppery. The pro-Brown California Working Families tried to drive that point home last week with the release of an online ad titled “Lies.” detailing just a few recent examples of Megspeak:

Donkey Ad Watch: Another Whitman Ad Slammed by Factcheck.org

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Donkey Ad Watch, Message/Framing, Politics on July 15, 2010 at 7:22 pm

In her continuing offensive against the truth, “Hitman” Whitman doubles down parading this bubbling cauldron of old and new lies across the state this week:

I’ll let Factcheck.org take it from here: (emphasis mine)

Whitman’s ad ties Brown to the state’s current pension problems. But the attack is misleading and unfair. Whitman’s ad suggests unions are backing Brown because he provided state employees with generous benefits while governor in the late 1970s and early 1980s. When asked back up this claim, the Whitman campaign said Brown signed into law the Ralph C. Dills Act, which gave public employees collective bargaining rights, and charged that the Dills Act “resulted in billions in unfunded pension liability.” That’s not true. The state’s staggering pension problems stem from numerous actions that occurred long after Brown left office.

Yes, the unions are backing Brown and they and others are prepared to raise and spend millions on his behalf, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The paper said in a Feb. 10 article that California Working Families plans to raise $20 to $30 million and spend 70 percent of that on helping Brown’s campaign. But the Whitman ad goes too far when it seeks to blame Brown for the state’s current pension problems.

This is no surprise to us. We posted on her all too-obvious campaign strategy of lie, lie and lie some more here.

For all of the details on this ad and other Whitman fictions go to the article on Factcheck.org here.


Donkey Ad Watch: Johnson Slings Great Lakes Mud at Feingold

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Donkey Ad Watch, Politics on July 14, 2010 at 9:58 pm

Wisconsin wacko and senate-hopeful Ron “glad there’s global warming” Johnson slings this muddy ad days after Russ Feingold’s oil-soaked missive earlier this week.

Seriously, who thought we’d get the first mud slinging of the season in mid-July… literally! For background, we posted about this race over the weekend here, and you can find the recent Feingold ad here.

This is one race to keep an eye on. Just make sure to wear your galoshes.

- SH

Donkey Ad Watch: New Feingold Spot

In 2010 Midterm Elections, Donkey Ad Watch, Politics on July 13, 2010 at 7:56 pm

We posted on this race a few days ago here.

And an update from Think Progress on Feingold’s opponent, Ron Johnson, and a sampling of the lunatic positions this man has taken which his Republican allies can’t quite fathom:

“He (Johnson, e.d.) has been criticized recently for opposing an anti-sex offenders bill, the Child Victim Act, and for saying that he is “glad there’s global warming.” Last month, when asked if he would support drilling for oil in the Great Lakes, Johnson — who owns more than $100,000 in BP stock — replied, “I think we have to, get the oil where it is.” At a town hall on Wednesday in Howards Grove, Wisconsin, ThinkProgress asked Rep. Tom Petri (R-WI) — who was sporting a Ron Johnson for Senate bumper sticker — if he agreed with Johnson’s support for Great Lakes oil drilling. Petri said he personally hasn’t supported Great Lakes drilling, but seemed genuinely baffled by Johnson’s radical views, and refused to comment.”

- SH

UPDATE: New Johnson spot is here.

h/t to Cory Leibmann who covers Wisconsin like the stout Packer D at Eye On Wisconsin. Check him out.

UPDATE: The Raw Story reports that Ron Johnson owns at least $116,000 in BP stock here:

Ron Johnson, a leading Republican challenger for Wisconsin’s U.S. Senate seat, owns at least $116,000 in BP stock plus substantial shares in two other oil companies. Recently released campaign finance documents show the Oshkosh businessman has between $116,000 and $315,000 in BP PLC stock.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers